Wednesday, April 12, 2023

Best Game Pass and Xbox Live Deals: Discounted Subscriptions Starting at $4 a Month - CNET

Snag an Xbox gaming subscription at a reduced price.

from CNET https://ift.tt/wKdAV9j

Latest Tech News

The only thing more surprising than learning that Deadpool star Ryan Reynolds had purchased an ownership stake in the new Mint Mobile was learning that his new network had some of the best mobile deals in the US mobile market. 

T-Mobile acquired the MVNO last month, and its first changes actually seem positive for new and existing customers. Here’s why Mint Mobile is still an astonishingly good deal. 

Mint Mobile has always run on T-Mobile’s network, but its offering was somewhat unique, halfway between a Prepaid wireless and Postpaid wireless plan. Customers can buy three, six, or twelve months in advance, and the more you buy up front, the cheaper the plan costs. 

Mint Mobile and T-Mobile buyout announcement hug video screen grab

Ryan Reynolds hugging T-Mobile's CEO Mike Sievert (Image credit: T-Mobile)

Mint Mobile’s cheapest plan is an admirable $15 per month, if you pay $180 up front for the full year. For that price you get Unlimited LTE data, and up to 4GB of 5G network use. You can even use your phone as a mobile hotspot without an extra fee, but that data comes out of your monthly 4GB cap. After you run out of data, you just get much slower network access.

No other major US carrier offers a plan so inexpensive, even for a prepaid plan. Both AT&T and Verizon offer prepaid plans with a data cap. AT&T will give you 5GB of data, including faster 5G networking, for $30. Verizon offers a 15GB cap on its smallest prepaid plan, and you pay $45.

The big problem is that both of those plans charge extra if you run out of data, they don’t simply slow you down to 2006 network speeds.

Perhaps noticing what Mint Mobile offers, AT&T also has a prepaid plan that lets you pay for up to a year in advance. You can pay $300 for the year, or $25/month equivalent, and get 16GB of data instead of just 5GB. You get a lot more data for less if you pay up front.

T-Mobile is giving every Mint Mobile user more data

Maybe this is why T-Mobile has announced it will be improving the Mint Mobile offering. Subscribers on the 4GB plan will now get 5GB. Mint used to offer 10GB per month for $20, or 15GB per month for $25 if you pay a full year up front, similar to AT&T. Now you get 15GB or 20GB per month for the same price. 

On AT&T you get 16GB per month, but on Mint you get 20GB per month for the same yearly price. 

For subscribers on an unlimited plan, the amount of 5G hotspot data you can use before Mint slows you down has increased. Now you can use up to 10GB of hotspot on 5G. Other subscribers still draw hotspot data from their monthly data cap. 

New customers will find the deal available this week, and existing customers don’t need to do anything. Your cell plan will automatically get more data. It’s common for cell carriers to leave existing subscribers out of new deals, so this is great news for Mint Mobile users. 

Deadpool sitting on chair

Would you buy a phone from him? How about a company? (Image credit: Fox)

You don’t need to pay for a full year of Mint Mobile up front. If you only want to buy three months in advance, you still only pay $45. That’s the price Verizon charges for 15GB of data on its cheapest prepaid plan, with no discount for paying for a bunch of months in advance. It’s clear that the big carriers have their eye on Mint Mobile and are aggressively circling its price options.

What makes Mint Mobile the clear winner is that its 20GB monthly plan is a red herring. If you buy only three months at a time, the unlimited plan is cheaper. Even for a full year, unlimited data costs only $60 more than the cheaper plan with a data limit. For $360 you get a year of unlimited 5G, or for $300 you get 20GB per month. If you run out, the network runs slower, you don’t get charged extra.

More data for a lot less money, so what is Mint missing?

The most expensive monthly plans will let you stream in full 4K glory. If you pay anything less, video quality suffers

One serious disadvantage for Mint Mobile is that it will only let you stream video in SD format. That’s standard definition, or the same resolution as your grandpa’s old DVD player. Forget about Full HD, and don’t even dream about 4K UHD resolution. 

In fact, only AT&T and T-Mobile, on the most expensive monthly plans, will let you stream in full 4K glory. If you pay anything less, video quality suffers. 

Apple Arcade

Verizon gives you Apple Arcade for free because you pay for it (Image credit: Apple)

The other things that Mint Mobile doesn’t offer are bundles of streaming services and subscription services that only confuse your budget. Verizon throws in a fruit salad of Apple Arcade, Apple Music, Hulu, and Disney Plus.

T-Mobile currently gives you Netflix and Apple TV Plus, or possibly Paramount Plus, depending on your plan.

It’s smart for Mint Mobile to forgo these bundles, as they only confuse customers, especially when it’s time to switch. It’s easy to abandon your carrier for a better deal, only to remember a month later that your monthly plan was paying for your Amazon Prime Video subscription.

Ryan Reynolds helped T-Mobile make its original buyout announcement, and the company said that Reynolds would remain around for creative purposes, ie. those great Mint Mobile commercials. Even without the MCU’s Merc with a Mouth, it’s good to see that Mint Mobile is staying friendly to customers.



from TechRadar - All the latest technology news https://ift.tt/dKO8Qm0

Xfinity vs. Verizon Fios: Which Should You Choose? - CNET

Xfinity boasts greater availability and lower introductory pricing, but Verizon Fios may be the better service overall. Here's why.

from CNET https://ift.tt/jkfiwpd

Tuesday, April 11, 2023

Best Xbox Cloud Gaming Controllers and Accessories in 2023 - CNET

Upgrade your gaming experience with the best Xbox Cloud Gaming controllers and accessories available.

from CNET https://ift.tt/XDjiLsG

Latest Tech News

The latest WhatsApp beta on Android is getting a neat, little upgrade as it is finally allowing users an in-app way to both edit and add new contacts.

You may be wondering: “Doesn’t this already exist? It seems like a pretty basic thing to have.” It sort of does, but it's not the same. Currently, if you try to edit your contacts, WhatsApp will redirect you to your phone’s native contacts list. According to WABetaInfo, people who have WhatsApp beta version 2.23.8.2, 8.4, 8.5, or 8.6 should now see a different user interface when editing or adding contacts that more closely reflects the app’s style. When you do add someone, their information will immediately be saved onto the device’s contacts list or Google account; whichever is available.

Now the question is, will this update have any kind of impact? As WABetaInfo points out, perhaps just a bit. You’re probably just going to shave off a few seconds plus save some processing power that would’ve been spent on launching another app. 

If you’re interested in checking out the redesigned contacts list, you can install the beta version of WhatsApp from the Google Play Store at any time. Be aware the update is rolling out in waves so you may not get it initially as was our case. All eager participants can do if they don’t get the redesign is wait until the feature arrives on their device within the coming days.

Future of WhatsApp

As for the future of WhatsApp on Android, there’s a decent amount in store. Back in early March, a different beta introduced Silence Unknown Callers to stop phone calls from unrecognized numbers. There’s also the mysterious Audio Chat which doesn’t have a lot of information surrounding it although some online theorize it’s the app’s attempt at emulating Discord voice chats. Also, Meta is expanding the Companion Mode beta to all beta testers giving users the ability to link their WhatsApp account to an entirely different mobile device.

For iOS, the developers are working on a way for users to upload their status updates directly to “Facebook Stories without leaving WhatsApp”. You can try this feature out through WhatApp’s TestFlight beta program, but only if you’re one of the lucky few who managed to join TestFlight before the last spot was taken nearly two years ago.

While we have you, be sure to check out TechRadar’s list of the best-encrypted messaging apps on Android for 2023



from TechRadar - All the latest technology news https://ift.tt/bzBS3Ca

What to Know If You're Considering Solar Panels in Kentucky - CNET

Solar panels are more affordable than you might expect. Here's how to make the most of them in Kentucky.

from CNET https://ift.tt/LjinqDY

AT&T's $60 Million Settlement: Time Is Running Out to Claim Money - CNET

If you were an AT&T subscriber, you could be eligible for part of a massive class-action settlement. But the deadline is coming up next month.

from CNET https://ift.tt/7hqb5Cu

Latest Tech News

In a week in which Twitter CEO and enfant terrible Elon Musk changed his Twitter handle to something we won't print here and removed the "W" from the company name on Twitter's San Francisco headquarters, the news about a real, [possibly] true, and [maybe] final date for removing all legacy blue checks might pass almost unnoticed.

Of course, Musk made it more newsworthy (or ridiculous) by selecting April 20, a.k.a "4/20" as the removal date, the significance of which is not lost on cannabis aficionados, including Musk, who famously toked up on the Joe Rogan podcast.

Musk has been threatening to remove legacy checkmarks for months and most recently set the timing for the first of April, but then nothing happened. Instead, the company altered blue check verbiage for legacy accounts to read, "This account is verified because it’s subscribed to Twitter Blue or is a legacy verified account." 

As a result, it was no longer possible to tell if someone had a blue check that was granted to them by Twitter's previous leadership or if they were paying the $7.99 a month fee.

See more

While the Twitter subscription plan predated Musk's takeover of the company in late 2022, it was the Tesla CEO who decided to force users to pay for verification. The initially botched plan didn't ask anyone to verify their identity and resulted in disasters, like Ely Lilly being impersonated on Twitter and claiming that insulin was now free.

The new system at least asks you to verify your identity with a credit card, but Musk's dreams of forcing millions of Twitter users to pay up may be stumbling. A recent Bloomberg report claims that just 116,000 people have signed up for Twitter Blue, not the millions Musk needs to turn the subscription services into a real revenue generator.

See more

As we've written before, major organizations as well as celebrities, including The White House, and Lebron James, are already refusing to play for the Blue Check.

Musk is also misrepresenting some organizations that already have the newer Gold checks (for business), by applying an erroneous description. Earlier this week, Twitter changed NPR (National Public Radio) Twitter bio to read "state affiliate media." 

When NPR and others protested, correctly pointing out that only a tiny fraction of NPR's funding comes from the US Government, Musk sort of relented and then added an almost equally misleading label that says NPR is government-funded.

If Musk sticks with this plan, it may soon be hard to tell who on Twitter is real, has earned authority, or is a genuine celebrity. It's not hard to buy a Blue check mark, change your Twitter name (but not official Twitter handle - the part that goes with "@"), to something else like, "ElonMusk", and swap in a photo of Musk. Only the eagle-eyed will spot the imposter in their Twitter stream.

Musk's crusade to level the Twitter playing field is unlikely to go well and soon the only 'verified' accounts will be people who actively paid, as some have noted, to "look cool without being cool."

The only question that remains is, will Musk stick with the 4/20 date or, as Musk and Twitter encounter more pushback, will it slide further out?



from TechRadar - All the latest technology news https://ift.tt/uPjMN8f

Used EVs Are a Hot New Market as Prices Trend Down - CNET

And researchers project that sales of new EVs will reach a record high in the first quarter of 2023.

from CNET https://ift.tt/zm4isMd

Monday, April 10, 2023

COVID-19 Expenses and Your Taxes: How to Write Off Medical Costs - CNET

If you spent money on COVID treatment in 2022, you may be eligible to claim some of it as a tax deduction.

from CNET https://ift.tt/CBaeXic

SpaceX Launch Begins Startup's Plan for 'Cell Towers in Space' - CNET

With a satellite lofted into low Earth orbit, Sateliot is joining the race to build networks that hop across the heavens.

from CNET https://ift.tt/LeX1uZO

Latest Tech News

Ampere has slipped a new Altra developer kit into its catalog, with software creators firmly in its sights.

Revealed in a tweet from the company’s head of edge, Joe Speed, the Altra Dev Kit, described by the company as an IoT prototype kit, is based on the Altra and is available in 32-core, 64-core, and 80-core formats costing $2,003, $2,518, and $2,621 respectively.

According to Ampere, the modules have been designed specifically with industrial embedded applications in mind, where long life, low failure rate, and strict revision control are all important.

Ampere Altra Dev Kit

At its heart are SoCs with either 32, 64, or 80 64-bit ARMv8.2 cores, which promise 1.7GHz, 2.2GHz, or 2.6GHz respectively.

Its COM-HPC Server base uses as many as three x16 and two x4 PCIe slots, two M.2 connectors, and four USB 3.0/2.0 ports. A further Gigabit Ethernet LAN port and GPIOs round up the Dev Kit’s connectivity, allowing a maximum of 768GB of DDR4 memory.

On top of the Dev Kit, Ampere is also offering a pre-build Developer Platform with the same number of cores ($3,250, $4,200, and $4,784) with a three to four week lead time, along with a 128-core version ($5,658) with a six to eight week wait time. Each also has the option to add a further four 10GbE LAN ports to the single GbE LAN port, though many of the models have sold out currently.

From the box, the Dev Platform runs Ubuntu Server OS however other operating systems are compatible including consumer-focused Windows.

While the 750W power unit does present a pretty hefty environmental consideration, Ampere will offer an optional liquid cooling assembly.



from TechRadar - All the latest technology news https://ift.tt/whIaqeE

Latest Tech News

There's no question that Apple is hard at work on its latest next-gen silicon, the Apple M3 chip, but if a new report is correct, then it'll be a lot more advanced than we realized.

It has long been speculated that Apple would be going with TSMC's 3nm process for its M3-series chips, but it looks like Apple will skip this iteration entirely and go for TSMC's N3E, which is a more advanced 3nm process at the Taiwanese chip foundry.

The report from the China Times, via Wccftech, indicates that Apple will be the first customer to use this process node and that it will use it for both the M3 chip expected to power the next MacBook Air and iPad Pro. 

It might also be using the advanced 3nm node for its A17 Bionic chip, which is what will power a future iPhone and non-pro iPad, but as with all things Apple, take everything with a grain of salt. This company in particular is about as tight-lipped as a Skull & Bones member during pledge week.

What an advanced 3nm process might mean for the MacBook Air

It was initially thought that the Apple M2 chip announced in 2022 would be fabbed on a 3nm process, but that turned out to not be the case. Whether that's because of lingering issues around Covid and supply chains isn't known, but Apple went with 5nm for both M1 and M2 chips, and it undoubtedly didn't get the performance gains from M2 it was hoping for.

The M2 chip is impressive, sure, but its performance improvement over the M1 chip was a fairly standard gen-on-gen refresh. A jump to 3nm though would be much more substantial, actually offering a compelling reason to make the jump from an M1 MacBook Air to an M3 MacBook Air.

Personally, I think the MacBook Air (M1) is still the best laptop for most users thanks to its phenomenal performance, excellent battery life, and even better pricing. The price increase for the MacBook Air (M2) is hard to justify, in my opinion, given the modest increase in performance over its predecessor.

That could very well change with the jump to TSMC's N3E, which should bring a substantial improvement to performance on the order of 30% or more, as well as even better battery life. Given how poor sales of the M2 Mac lineup have been in the past year, Apple really needs to give people a better reason to switch than a bland redesign and some fancy marketing.



from TechRadar - All the latest technology news https://ift.tt/PZVX3gF

What to Know Before Purchasing Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids - CNET

According to an audiologist, here's everything you need to know about over-the-counter hearing aids.

from CNET https://ift.tt/cZ9Doka

Fastest ISP in the West: Ziply Fiber Unleashes 10Gbps Internet - CNET

Customers across Ziply's fiber footprint can now sign up for the speedy, symmetrical 10-gig service.

from CNET https://ift.tt/JqrUMK7

Latest Tech News

Some TV shows are like comfort food, and for me, there’s no show more comforting than Peep Show. The British sitcom from the early 2000s h...