Sunday, April 4, 2021

Latest Gadgets News

Oppo A74 5G could launch on April 13 according to an Australian retailer’s website. The phone may be powered by the Snapdragon 480 SoC and 6GB of RAM.

from Gadgets 360 https://ift.tt/3fE5Mpy

Latest Gadgets News

Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is reportedly receiving April 2021 Android security patch with the latest update that is being rolled out in Spain and other European markets currently. Samsung had updated Galaxy S10 Lite to Android 11-based One UI 3.1 last month.

from Gadgets 360 https://ift.tt/2PU2Vy2

Latest Tech News

The iPhone 12 and the Google Pixel 5 aren’t just leading flagship phones – they’re standard bearers for the two major smartphone platforms in the world, iOS and Android.

Indeed, comparing these two phones means pitching two of the world’s biggest tech companies against one another. Both Apple and Google have set out their stall for what the ideal smartphone should look like, from software up to hardware.

So how do these two headline acts compare to one another? With a number of similarities and even more differences, it’s a truly fascinating comparison to make.

iPhone 12 vs Pixel 5 price and availability

The iPhone 12 landed on October 23, 2020. Prices start from $799 / £799 / AU$1,349 for the 64GB model, moving up to $849 / £849 / AU$1,429 for 128GB and $949 / £949 / AU$1,599 for 256GB.

The Google Pixel 5 was made available just a week or so earlier, on October 15, 2020. There’s just the one Pixel 5 model out there, and it’s available for an RRP of $699 / £599 / AU$999 from the official Google Store.

If we’re comparing entry models, that’s a $100 / £200 / AU$359 premium for the iPhone 12. But if we’re looking at a strict spec matchup, then the 128GB iPhone 12 costs $150 / £250 / AU$430 more than the 128GB Pixel 5.

Design

These two phones bear very little similarity in terms of external design, but both buck trends in their own way.

In the case of the iPhone 12, it moves away from the obsession with smooth curves and rounded edges that appears to have taken hold of the wider smartphone industry. The iPhone 12 steps back to a time of flat surfaces and sharp edges, the likes of which haven’t been seen in a top-level phone since the iPhone 5S.

With the Pixel 5, on the other hand, it’s a materials thing. There’s no glass rear panel here, nor is there even some form of hybrid plastic of the type seen in the Galaxy S21. Instead, Google has stripped things back to the metal, with a cool yet premium material that wraps right around the sides.

There’s an interesting matte finish to this metal, too, which makes it feel a bit more like polycarbonate than your typical aluminum frame. The device is available in just two shades, Sorta Sage and Just Black, which rather pales next to the iPhone 12’s Silver, Graphite, Gold, and Pacific Blue options.

Image 1 of 2

iPhone 12 deals

The iPhone 12 (Image credit: Apple)
Image 2 of 2

Google Pixel 5

Google Pixel 5 (Image credit: Future)

Still, metal is metal, and the Pixel 5 would seem to be more robust than the glass-backed iPhone 12. However, it’s worth pointing out that Apple’s phone comes with a new nano-crystalline Ceramic Shield screen around the front, which is said to be four times stronger than competing materials. It also has a superior IP68 rating to a depth of six metres of water for up to 30 minutes.

In terms of proportions, the iPhone 12 measures 146.7 x 71.5 x 7.4mm (HWD) next to the Pixel 5’s 144.7 x 70.4 x 8mm. This means that the Google phone is a smidgen shorter and narrower than its Apple counterpart, but also half-a-millimeter thicker. These are two of the lightest flagship phones on the market, too – although the iPhone 12 is the heavier unit at 164g compared to the Pixel 5 at 151g.

We weren’t massive fans of the Pixel 5’s stiff, nondescript side buttons in our review. Conversely, the iPhone 12 includes premium metal switches and that glorious Apple alert slider. The Pixel 5’s speakers, while stereo like the iPhone 12, seem to have taken a step back, too.

Another design difference is linked to a differing approach to biometric authentication. The Pixel 5 has a rather old-fashioned rear-mounted fingerprint sensor, while the iPhone 12 has a prominent screen notch for Face ID. It’s arguable that Apple’s approach is more advanced – yet, these days, the ability to unlock your phone wearing a mask is pretty darned useful.

All in all, we prefer the striking iPhone 12 design over the rather utilitarian Pixel 5. But they’re distinct enough that this could well come down to a matter of preference.

Display

As different as these phones look, both opt for similarly compact OLED displays.

The iPhone 12 comes with a 6.1-inch Super Retina XDR OLED screen with 2532 x 1170 resolution. It’s one of the most balanced displays on the market in terms of color accuracy, and it can hit a peak brightness level of 1200 nits, with 600 nits in typical conditions.

In the other corner, the Pixel 5 offers up a similarly bright 6-inch OLED with a slightly lesser 2340 x 1080 resolution.

Where the Pixel 5 wins is for refresh rate. At 90Hz, Google’s flagship falls short of the 120Hz leading pack, but ends up 50% more fluid than the 60Hz iPhone 12. It’s a bit of an oversight on Apple’s part, if we’re being honest.

The iPhone 12 wins out for image fidelity, then, but the Pixel 5 scores big on fluidity. We’ll hand the win to the Google phone based on that latter result, but it’s close.

Camera

Google Pixel 5

Google Pixel 5 (Image credit: Future)

Both phones believe themselves to be photographic champs with their stripped-back, dual-camera offerings. And an initial glance suggests a similar approach.

The iPhone 12 includes a pair of 12-megapixel sensors: one main wide example with a large f/1.6 aperture, and one ultra-wide with an f/2.4 aperture. Google’s Pixel 5 supplies a 12.2-megapixel main sensor with an f/1.7 aperture, and a 16-megapixel f/2.2 ultra-wide.

Both main sensors give you the same 1.4µm pixel size, and both are backed by OIS. Neither camera setup offers a dedicated telephoto lens, relying on clever cropping algorithms for those zoomed shots.

Google’s approach to smartphone camera mastery has carried its Pixel line a long way. Rather than upgrading its hardware every year – a resource-intensive approach that has inevitable repercussions for the price – it prefers to use the same old sensor and makes advances through its formidable image-processing algorithms.

Of course, Apple has also made huge strides in recent years with its own image-processing techniques. The result is that both Apple and Google are among the very best at producing balanced smartphone camera images.

Sure enough, these are two of the very best camera phones in the business. Both devices take crisp, balanced shots in daylight and spookily clear shots at night. Google’s night shots are perhaps a little brighter, but the iPhone 12 can apply its Night mode across all of its cameras, even the selfie cam.

We prefer the wider nature of the iPhone 12’s 120-degree ultra-wide camera, which fits way more in than the rather piddly 107-degree field of view of the Pixel 5. Still, the way that Google manages to balance out the usual distortions and color balance issues with its ultra-wide feels magical.

Meanwhile, the iPhone 12 blows the Pixel 5 (and pretty much every non-Apple phone) out of the water when it comes to the quality of its video capture. Both can take 4K video at 60fps, but the iPhone 12’s is simply better.

All in all, we have to give the overall win to Apple. It’s made more forward strides in a greater number of areas for an all-round better camera experience – but it’s pretty darned close.

Specs and performance

iPhone 12

The iPhone 12 (Image credit: TechRadar)

One area where there really is no room for debate is performance. The iPhone 12 absolutely blows the Google Pixel 5 out of the water on this front.

Of course, the A14 Bionic chip that powers the iPhone 12 blows every Android flagship out of the water. It’s the most powerful mobile processor in the business, after all.

But the Pixel 5 doesn’t even put up a fight, owing to Google’s landmark decision to compromise on power in the name of cost-effectiveness. If you want to know how the Pixel 5 is so much cheaper than the iPhone 12, exhibit number one would be its use of the Snapdragon 765 CPU.

This is a mid-range Qualcomm chip that sits well below the Snapdragon 865 that powered most 2020 Android flagship phones, and even further behind the Snapdragon 888 that powers the class of 2021.

The difference is spelled out with the Geekbench 5 multicore benchmark tests, with the Pixel 5 scoring 1,617 compared to the iPhone 12’s 3,859. That’s considerably more than double the output.

Google’s phone might be backed by double the RAM of the iPhone 12 – 8GB versus 4GB – but that’s largely irrelevant given the differing ways Android and iOS make use of their memory.

In practical terms, the Pixel 5 breezes through a range of tasks, from browsing the web to gaming and playing media. We only really saw any notable performance dips after sustained bouts of Call of Duty: Mobile, and then not during gameplay.

But the iPhone 12 has such a generous amount of headroom that we feel confident it will feel fast for years. We can’t quite say the same for the Pixel 5 with a degree of certainty – especially given Apple’s superior track record of ongoing hardware support.

The Pixel 5 partially strikes back with the provision of 128GB of storage as standard. The iPhone 12 gets 64GB, which really doesn’t feel like enough any more. Sure, you can specify 128GB or 256GB, but that will cost you big.

Both phones pack 5G as standard, so there’s no advantage there to speak of. Nor can we call a winner when it comes to software.

Against literally every other Android manufacturer, Apple arguably has an edge here – but not with the Pixel. Even the slickest Android UI remains a modification of the core Google OS, so even if you prefer the way Samsung (or OnePlus, or Xiaomi) does things, it isn’t a pure or perfectly optimized experience. Not so with the Pixel 5, which is Google through-and-through, just as the iPhone 12 is all-Apple all of the time.

Battery life

The iPhone 12’s 2,815mAh battery looks pitiful next to the Pixel 5’s 4,080mAh unit.

However, it isn’t quite as simple as that, since iOS is generally more frugal than Android. Also, the iPhone 12 has a better, more efficient processor and a less power-intensive 60Hz display.

Ultimately, both phones have good but not outstanding stamina. We’d give the Pixel 5 the edge – it’s a big improvement over the Pixel 4, in particular – but both handsets are firmly in the ‘solid day of use’ category with anything between light and very heavy usage.

The iPhone 12 has a slight edge when it comes to recharging, with support for 20W wired charging compared to the Pixel 5’s 18W. But at least the Pixel ships with that charger. You need to buy the iPhone’s fast charger (or any charger, for that matter) separately.

The iPhone 12 also supports 15W Qi wireless charging next to the Pixel 5’s 12W.

Takeaway

Image 1 of 2

iPhone 12

The iPhone 12 (Image credit: TechRadar)
Image 2 of 2

Google Pixel 5

Google Pixel 5 (Image credit: Future)

While the iPhone 12 and the Pixel 5 ostensibly give us a tantalising ‘Apple vs Google’ face-off, direct comparisons are quite tricky.

Apple has opted for a bold, premium design statement with its iPhone 12, bringing a number of a Pro flourishes to its mainstream line. Conversely, the Pixel 5 strips things back from the Pixel 4, offering a flagship-approximate experience for a mid-range price.

The Pixel 5 is much cheaper than the iPhone 12 as a result, which makes it the better choice for those on a £500(ish) budget. For that money you’ll get a camera system, a display, and a clean software experience that’s competitive with Apple’s.

If you’re willing to spend more, then the iPhone 5 undoubtedly feels like the more premium phone – and its performance is in another league entirely.



from TechRadar - All the latest technology news https://ift.tt/3fIqWmC

Latest Gadgets News

Samsung Galaxy F12 and Samsung Galaxy F02s are set to launch in India today at 12pm (noon) via a virtual event that will be livestreamed on YouTube.

from Gadgets 360 https://ift.tt/3wsEkB1

Latest Gadgets News

Godzilla vs. Kong has grossed more than $285.4 million worldwide at the box office. About $6 million from India, $48.5 million in the US, and $137.1 million in China.

from Gadgets 360 https://ift.tt/3cPsngX

Latest Gadgets News

Tata Sky Binge+, Tata Sky+ HD, and Tata Sky HD set-top boxes are currently available at discounted prices. Customers can avail a discount of up to Rs. 400 on the purchase of a Tata Sky HD set-top box.

from Gadgets 360 https://ift.tt/3fHVaG0

Latest Gadgets News

Amazon has apologized to US Representative Mark Pocan, admitting to scoring an "own goal" in its initial denial of his suggestion that its drivers were sometimes forced to urinate in bottles during their delivery rounds.

from Gadgets 360 https://ift.tt/3wmd07D

Latest Gadgets News

NASA's Ingenuity helicopter has been dropped on the surface of Mars in preparation for its first flight, the US space agency said.

from Gadgets 360 https://ift.tt/3miF7jg

2022 Toyota 86 embraces sports car evolution with fresh looks, more power - Roadshow

The Subaru BRZ's twin is finally here, and like the BRZ, the new Toyota 86 keeps the back-to-basics sports car formula in great shape.

from CNET https://ift.tt/3wqdyt9

Latest Tech News

Yesterday, data of over 533 million Facebook users across the globe was leaked online by a threat actor. 

According to Indian media reports, the data breach includes the personal information of 6 million users in India. 

The hacked data comprises phone numbers, Facebook ID, full name, location, past location, birthdate, (sometimes) email address, account creation date, relationship status, and personal bios.

Security researchers have warned that the leaked data can be used to commit fraud by impersonating a person.

It is said that the data could be a couple of years old and could have been extracted using a bug (a bug in the 'Add Friend' feature on Facebook) that the social media giant had fixed back in 2019. 

But threat actors continued to circulate the data until it was fully released practically for free yesterday. 

Second breach of Indians' details in as many weeks

The worrying point from India's perspective is that details of over 6 million users from the country could be part of the leak.

This breach comes on the back of major hacking at MobiKwik digital wallet

Though the company had controversially pooh-poohed the breach, online researchers said that the data of crores of users were available in the public domain.

In that 'largest KYC leak ever', the data dump was said to contain 350GB of MySQL dumps or 500 databases, 99 million email, phone, passwords, physical addresses, IP address, GPS location and device related data, as well as 40 million records of card numbers, expiry dates, card hashes (SHA256 encrypted).

Further, it also has 7.5TB of merchant KYC data pertaining to 3.5 million merchants.

This is how you check if your data has been compromised

As far as yesterday's leak at Facebook goes, there is a way to check whether your email was exposed in the breach or not.

There is a data breach notification service by name: 'Have I Been Pwned?

The person running the site Troy Hunt, a well-known and respected online security specialist, has added the leaked data to the site to help users determine if their Facebook data was exposed in the leak.

Users just need to input their email address, and the site will list out whether their data had been breached.

Users have to the key in their email address in the search field on the site. Once they click the 'pwned?' button, a list of all the data breaches the email was exposed to will be displayed.

This writer did try out the service with his email id. Mercifully, there was no breach through this FB leak. But as it happened, it also emerged that some of the writer's details may have been compromised through a leak from an url shortening service longtime back.

What if details of your phone number have been leaked?

Anyway, the biggest data detail to emerge from Facebook leak was phone numbers. Only 2.5 million out of the 533 million Facebook member records also included an email address.

So, if you search for your email address and 'Have I Been Pwned?' does not return a matching result, you could still be part of yesterday's leak.

But as of now, the site does not give details on possible data compromise using your phone number.

The site administrator has tweeted that he is looking into how users can input phone numbers to see if they were exposed in the Facebook leak.

He also asked whether the FB phone numbers should be searchable in his site. "I’m thinking through the pros and cons in terms of the value it adds to impacted people versus the risk presented if it’s used to help resolve numbers to identities."



from TechRadar - All the latest technology news https://ift.tt/3rOrZDJ

Latest Tech News

Adobe Photoshop has been embracing the power of AI to a mildly terrifying degree recently, but now it's getting something slightly less scary than neural filters – a new feature called Super Resolution.

The handy new tool, which is now available in Camera Raw 13.2 and will be landing soon on Lightroom and Lightroom Classic, has a simple claim – to be able to double the resolution of your photos using machine learning, while improving their quality.

This is a big deal for most photographers, particularly those of us who remember the early days of the megapixel wars. Back in the day (we’re old, okay?) you couldn’t go near a camera launch without the megapixel count of a camera being thrust at you.

Adobe Super Resolution

(Image credit: Adobe)

Four megapixels. Eight. 12. 18. We remember when the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV, with its 30.4MP sensor, arrived – that was it, the end of the resolution wars. From that point on, virtually any camera you could buy would offer enough resolution to do virtually anything with the images you wanted. 

That’s doubly true in the age of Instagram. Actually, it’s 25 times more true in the age of Instagram, as in most cases you only ever need to upload a 1080 x 1080 image – just 1.2MP’s worth of photography.

Adobe doesn’t think resolution worries have gone away, though, which is why its new Super Resolution has made its way to Adobe Camera Raw. It advertises something simple – it will take an image (JPGs and raws are both supported) and doubles the number of pixels along the horizontal and vertical edges. 

Sceptics will be reaching for their “but it already does that” comments as we speak, but Super Resolution uses machine learning, theoretically allowing it to produce superior-quality results. But does it? We ran it through some tests to find out.

How to use Adobe's Super Resolution mode

Using the tool is simple. Use Adobe Bridge and open an image in Adobe Camera Raw (ACR), then right-click your image and click Enhance – or use CMD-Shift-D if you’re in a rush.

Adobe Photoshop Super Resolution

(Image credit: Future)

The Super Resolution tool itself is a simple one – a lonesome checkbox marked Super Resolution, and the ability to click and hold on your image preview to see what ACR is going to do.

Adobe Photoshop Super Resolution

(Image credit: Future)

Click Enhance (it's good to see Adobe finally embracing the terminology of late-90s classic Enemy of the State), and your computer will whir away for a bit. Super Resolution is heavily dependent on your system’s GPU, so the more you spent on that, the faster your results will come.

How long does Super Resolution take and is it worth it?

Of course, Photoshop, Bridge and Lightroom (other photo editors are available) have offered image upscaling for years, so what advantages does Super Resolution offer? Having read some breathlessly enthusiastic experiences, we eagerly set up a few comparisons and…results were variable, to put it mildly.

If all you want is to create a supersize version of a decent, un-cropped image, you can save substantial amounts of time – and even image quality – using Photoshop’s bog standard image resize. 

We tried a few images – opening them, resizing them to 200% their original linear dimensions, and then layering an 'enhanced' resize on top. While there was always a difference between the two, the difference was rarely in Super Resolution’s favor.

The results

1.) The robin test

A good example of the limitations of Photoshop's Super Resolution mode is this frame of a robin. On the left is what the original image (which you can see here) looks like resized to twice its original dimensions using Photoshop’s basic image re-sizer, with resampling set to automatic. You can see the full-size version here.

And the version on the right (which you can see in full-size here) is what it looks like after being 'enhanced'. Can you tell the difference? Us neither, although with Super Resolution producing an enormous DNG file each time you use it, our hard disk certainly could.

Also, zooming into 100% showed a problem. The difference is almost unbearably slight, but the basic resize (left) shows more sharpness and fine detail than the far more processor and hard disk intensive Super Resolution file on the right. That makes the score '1-0' in favor of doing things the old fashioned way.

Adobe Photoshop Super Resolution

Basic image upscaling (left) vs Super Resolution (right) (Image credit: Future)

2.) The rhino test

Next up, we tried comparing the two techniques on this photo of a rhino. This time we’ll skip straight to the side-by-side comparison, as there’s no way you’ll spot the difference otherwise.

Adobe Photoshop Super Resolution

See the full-size version here (Image credit: Future)

This time, our subject does show a slight improvement in texture and sharpness where we’ve used Super Resolution (right) versus using the basic resize tool (left). You can see the full-size version here.

Adobe Photoshop Super Resolution

Basic image upscaling (left) vs Super Resolution (right) (Image credit: Future)

However, it’s also mis-colored our image, dropping in some violet aberrations that now need fixing. Even if these weren’t here we’d still wonder whether Adobe’s new AI-powered tool was worth it. 

Resizing an image using Photoshop’s bargain-basement re-sizer – in these first two examples – produced similar or better results and was ridiculously fast (about 22 seconds, versus over 54 seconds) compared to the Super Resolution tool.

3.) The Porto redemption

It’s not all doom and gloom for Super Resolution, though – our experiments suggest there will be times when the feature is worth its weight in, if not gold, at least something reasonably heavy-duty.

For example, here’s a picture of the bank-side in photo-friendly Porto.

Adobe Photoshop Super Resolution

See the full-size version here (Image credit: Future)

And below is a super-aggressive crop of the same image. After the crop we were left with an image just 2,733 x 1,822 pixels, which is pretty tight if you’re looking to print.

Adobe Photoshop Super Resolution

See the full-size version here (Image credit: Future)

We resized the image using Photoshop’s old-style re-sizer and the Super Resolution tool, and the results are actually pretty striking. For a closer look, check out the full-size version.

Adobe Photoshop Super Resolution

Basic image upscaling (left) vs Super Resolution (right) (Image credit: Future)

You still need to be paying attention, but the basic-resize version (left) is way softer than the Super Resolution version on the right. 

There’s more detail, sharpness, and although the trained eye will pick up a slightly raised amount of chromatic aberration (purple and green fringing), it’s barely worth mentioning.

4.) The tiger test 

Our last Super Resolution test was this photo of a tiger, which is cropped down from this original snap.

Adobe Photoshop Super Resolution

See the full-size version of this crop (Image credit: Future)

And, after upscaling using both Super Resolution and Photoshop’s old-school image re-sizer, here’s the side-by-side comparison of the results. Or you can get a closer look by checking out the full-size version here.

Adobe Photoshop Super Resolution

Basic image upscaling (left) vs Super Resolution (right) (Image credit: Future)

At this point we began to question our eyes, our sanity, our reason for being. The basic resize – which took seconds – is visibly, appreciably sharper than the Super Resolution version on the right.

The verdict

All of this leaves us struggling to make a call. There isn’t really a buying decision, as such – if you have a Creative Cloud subscription that includes Photoshop, you already have Super Resolution, so the question is if it’s worth the extra time. 

In some cases, appreciably, yes – you’ll be able to enlarge images, preserving, or even creating, extra sharpness as you go. In other cases, appreciably, no – your images could very well end up slightly softer, and in either case you’ll be splitting hairs between getting Photoshop to do a basic up-rezzing job or spending more time having Adobe Camera Raw doing its 'Enhance' job.

The alternative: Gigapixel

All of which is before you consider Topaz’ popular Gigapixel AI software. It’s long-winded and expensive at $99.99, but given our crop of Porto to work on, it produced a visibly stronger image than either of Photoshop’s efforts. This is particularly noticeable in the full-size image.

Adobe Photoshop Super Resolution

Adobe Super Resolution (left) vs Gigapixel AI (right) (Image credit: Future)

Then we tried using Gigapixel on our robin image – just as a sanity check, you see – and the whole thing fell apart again, with our Gigapixel image introducing a load of previously-absent noise, mottling the fine detail of our bird. 

If ever there was a topic of image editing that deserved the deployment of the shrug emoji, image resizing appears to be it. Get a closer look with the full-size version of the below comparison.

Adobe Photoshop Super Resolution

Adobe Super Resolution (left) vs Gigapixel AI (right) (Image credit: Future)

Still, despite these mixed results, the writing’s certainly on the wall for image editing – AI and cloud-based edits are going to be the way of the future. Has Adobe cracked it? 

Super Resolution is an interesting but irritatingly inconsistent way of up-rezzing images, particularly compared to some excellent third party software. But if you’re unwilling to spend the money for Gigapixel, if you find yourself frustrated with how Photoshop upscales using its traditional tools, we’d give the cloud a try.



from TechRadar - All the latest technology news https://ift.tt/2PrGgcB

Latest Gadgets News

China's ByteDance has told an Indian court that a government freeze on its bank accounts in a probe of possible tax evasion amounts to harassment and was done illegally, according to a filing.

from Gadgets 360 https://ift.tt/3dx0NV3

Latest Gadgets News

A leaker says that information on more than 500 million Facebook users — including phone numbers and other data — virtually for free.

from Gadgets 360 https://ift.tt/3wtuqPt

Latest Gadgets News

LG Electronics said it will wind down its loss-making mobile division — a move that is set to make it the first major smartphone brand to completely withdraw from the market.

from Gadgets 360 https://ift.tt/3cMPjxw

LG will shut down smartphone business in July to focus on smart home, robotics - CNET

It's the end of an era for the one-time phone giant, which has struggled to compete with Apple, Samsung and Chinese brands.

from CNET https://ift.tt/3sSpy4i

Heat Domes and Surging Grid Demand Threaten US Power Grids with Blackouts

A new report shows a sharp increase in peak electricity demand, leading to blackout concerns in multiple states. Here's how experts say ...